Aaaaha! .. Now I see:
You have somewhere seen or heard someone `qualifying´ a pirouette or qualify a gimmick or sth, then meaning "having done a ground-state-qualify after it". While usually "qualifying" means to do two periods of a pattern or of a trick or of a siteswap or of the ground-state itself (regardless of what happens before or after).
In that very very special case, where it - the gimmick or the pirouette or sth single - cannot be confused with doing two rounds of that gimmick or of that pirouette, "qualifying it" can only mean "having confirmed it (as well-done) by doing a qualify (=two rounds) of the ground-state after it".
So, - in that sense - [queer wording:] "qualifying a flash of 97531" can only mean "having done a qualify of 5b-cascade after the 97531-flash", or [better:] "flashed 97531(in)to a 5-ball-cascade-qualify".
"Qualifying 97531" should mean: "9753197531 (no matter from or to what in the first place)". Else it will be misconceived as that latter.
Otherwise, - when it's mistakable - you cannot `qualify´ something by doing something other after. (sort of post-pattern, post-trick) So, you can't "qualify 97531" by doing two rounds of cascade after it, but only by doing two rounds of 97531.
For 360-ies, I'd say, that ..
"qualifying n-up 360° (in)to cascade" = "flashed (in)to cascade" = "doing or flashing n-up 360° (in)to cascade"
"qualify n-up 360°" = two rounds of "n-up 360° " = "consecutive n-ups 360° ".
Else `qualifying´ "single n-ups + 360° " would be misconceivable with "consecutive n-up 360° ".
↧
Post by 7b_wizard
↧