Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12018

Post by Stephen Meschke

This analysis works best if the patterns are very popular, taken seriously, and can be run for 100+ throws.

If only the data from 'good' jugglers (100+ catches of each pattern) is considered, 645 is only 1.14 times harder than (6x,4)*.

Relative difficulty changes for pattern duration. For example, it's probably several times easier to qualify (6x,4)* than 645, but only slightly easier to run (6x,4)* for 100+ throws.

Post reply

by Stephen Meschke, in response to this post 2015-11-02 02:30:52


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 12018

Trending Articles