Yes. And no.
I never wanted to be a "writer-rationalist".
I'm not the only one here who doesn't write perfect unmisconceivable english and most of my posts were clear.
Juggling lingo also isn't ripe for clear writing. And it's frequently misused ("qualify a `trick´ after the trick by doing a cascade-qualify"?? .. leads to people thinking, you could qualify one run of a siteswap by doing two rounds of cascade after it) .
I'll account for better readability where possible, but I'm not taking unobjected that "all7b-wizard's posts are unreadable"-`witchhunt´-rubbish. [<-- exaggeration-apostrophees] That was true only for some (\few) posts of mine.