> I also believe, some slight differences in many siteswaps can hardly be described by siteswap-notation only
That's because siteswap is neither intended for nor suited to describing some of the finer points of a pattern.
Siteswap theory was never meant to describe all aspects of a pattern, although it is a widely held misconception that it does. For instance some people might interminably argue that 333 is a cascade, whereas 522 is a slower and bigger cascade, and 900 is a *really* high cascade, when in fact all three expressions are functionally indistinguishable within the terms of SS.
At its simplest it describes order of events, period. As such, it does a bloody good job of describing exactly what it intends to, and nothing more; it takes meddling jugglers to start to overload it with all manner of unintended nuances of meaning.
by Cedric Lackpot, in response to this post 2015-11-06 13:43:45