This post is source #5 that forwards this article to me in some way. Initially I failed to see why this article is that important.
I am all up for opening a wide dialog, as she suggests. The 'fame' that this article receives is probably a sign that the discussion is indeed not as active as it should.
Besides of that, I don't think much of it. There were many things I did not understand, and would require clarification before I could clear up my opinion, and a few things I disagreed with.
I wish there were more articles like this. Therefore she made a good start, just not from a position that I can understand.
Perhaps I'll post the comments which I've emailed to Bauke here bit by bit when it seems fitting.
by Daniel Simu, in response to this post 2015-12-14 02:13:10