@danielsimu - ["rules"]
Hmh ..
I don't see it so clear:
You can have distinct objectives, results to be gone for in juggling too, but hardly any or no clear guidelines, that will bring me there as i think is the case in other sports ( music and painting are very bad examples of mine as anything is possible there too, and any howto-books can only be propositions or approaches and many ways lead to a wealth of possibilities ).
Maybe I've just read too few juggling books.
Agreed for: In (``strict´´) toss-juggling, a drop is a fail.
Although transitions are fluent to easily deconstructing this. (Intended drops; juggling near and with the floor; Olivia Porter's drops being part of the act; .. )
I think, you really only slightly misread me there: I wasn't out for a "Yes." on ".. no toss-juggling-truths..", but rather hoped on some of such guidelines or general truths, something that I've overseen. Gather some wisdom here. Or else, to find out, that there indeed isn't any. (It was really a question, not a subsumed hypothesis). Wondering, how everything always ``depends´´ or can be done as you like, for it can't be "wrong".
I am somewhat gotten mixed up in notions and reference frames now ("art" vs "sport" vs different "disciplines" or "styles" .. then "guidelines" for what exactly?), but I'll take with me: juggling is too much an art (with no common default objectives?) to necessarily need rules like other competitive sports do, unless it's combat or some juggling-game with distinct rules.
↧
Post by 7b_wizard
↧