Here's consecutives 5b 5 up 180° https://youtu.be/UxdIyYr6Smw ..
two rounds of consecutive "5b 5 up 180° " would be a "qualify".
If now people start qualifying "tricks", "``certain´´ tricks according to WJF-rules" by doing a cascade-qualify after ``the trick´´, you can `qualify´ "5b 5 up 180°" in an `easy way´ -doing a cascade-qualify after it, or `the hard way´ - doing consecutives. That is simply misconceivable wording. It would become necessary to ..
.. either call the consecutives a "consecutive's qualify" to distinguish it from the "cascade qualify after the 5 up 180° flash" ..
.. or not call the non-consecutives (a flash!) a "qualify" in the first place (but call them "a 5 up 180°-flash(!) (in)to a (cascade) qualify" .
↧
Post by 7b_wizard
↧