Quantcast
Channel: The Juggling Edge - Forum posts
Browsing all 12042 articles
Browse latest View live

Post by LukasR

just watched the trailer, it reminded me of the wintergarten variety trailers you sometimes see in puplic traffic tv so maybe it has been inspiried by the berlin variety scene... but i agree that its a...

View Article


Post by charlieh

It's another European Entertainment Corporation production. They also produce the Moscow State Circus and Circus of Horrors in the UK. As far as I know most of the acts are 'bought in' from other...

View Article


Post by Little Paul

Omg Perth is gorgeous! The sun is out and I'm having a lovely walk along the river. If anyone is undecided about coming because the weather is shitty in most of the U.K. at the moment - get up here...

View Article

Post by Little Paul

http://imgur.com/GPrUvYePost replyby Little Paul, in response to this post 2016-03-30 16:44:13

View Article

Post by lukeburrage

Yup!Post replyby lukeburrage, in response to this post 2016-03-30 17:34:28

View Article


Post by James Hennigan

"Only the distance from the pivot to the center of gravity is relevant"I'm quite sure this is incorrect. How 'fast' the rod falls is determined by its angular acceleration. This is determined not only...

View Article

Post by DavidCain

My brother's upcoming Willy article, not mine! :)David CainPost replyby DavidCain, in response to this post 2016-03-30 19:55:02

View Article

Post by Mike Moore

Oops! Thanks for the correction.Post replyby Mike Moore, in response to this post 2016-03-30 20:40:31

View Article


Post by ChrisD

Thanks Charlie. The previous time I saw them in Norwich was in another incarnation, with an American theme, even if I can't remember the name. The skill level in that one was reasonably high, from what...

View Article


Post by peterbone

I see your point, although if that were the case would it not be the same for a non-inverted pendulum? Yet the period of oscillation of a pendulum is proportional to sqrt(L) at low amplitudes, where L...

View Article

Post by Austin

Hi guys, sorry if this has already been brought up before but I can't seem to find a clear explanation for whether a siteswap '1' throw counts as a throw/catch or not. I seems people usually count it...

View Article

Post by Stephen Meschke

I count 1 throws, unless it is in the shower pattern.The term qualify applies to numbers juggling, not technical juggling. For the purposes of collecting data, it is only important that you are...

View Article

Post by Austin

As for the 1s that is exacly my point- why are they not counted in the shower?I have always found the qualify to be a nice aim though so I usually apply it to everything. You're probably right...

View Article


Post by DavidCain

I count them in a shower and in the IJA Numbers Competition, which I helped write the rules for, they are counted.David CainPost replyby DavidCain, in response to this post 2016-03-31 16:33:43

View Article

Post by Pedro Pessotti

If you do a flash of a 3 ball shower (3 throws and catches) and you count all of the throws, you would end up with only 2 of the 3 balls being thrown as a 5 (siteswap 51), that would not be a complete...

View Article


Post by James Hennigan

I can't see any logic behind not counting 1s in shower patterns. The ball is caught, so it should count as a catch.However, it's not really that important. The only place I have encountered this is on...

View Article

Post by 7b_wizard

Juggle Wiki also counts only the high throws in shower patterns. (Don't remember why)Post replyby 7b_wizard, in response to this post 2016-03-31 19:16:42

View Article


Post by Austin

Thanks for the input. My thought was that for instance in 97531 it's only counted in rounds so you can't get 12 catches, and I read that was because they were thrown after the 9 so if you didn't catch...

View Article

Post by Austin

I see your logic. But if you start the shower with two in your feeding hand, there would be six throws for all the balls to be thrown twice.Post replyby Austin, in response to this post 2016-03-31...

View Article

Post by James Hennigan

The distribution of mass is always relevant to rotational motion. I assume the formula you are thinking of is T=2πsqrt(L/g)This only holds for 'simple' pendulums: Pendulums which consist of a bob...

View Article
Browsing all 12042 articles
Browse latest View live